What is it about Halifax–  How Come Developers Always Come Out On Top??

 

A few months ago, APL Properties Ltd announced that rather than building 209 apartment units, APL was going to shoe-horn 295 apartments at their Willow Tree site. That’s nearly a 30% increase—in the developer’s profits.  As many know, the Willow Tree is a hotly contested hi-rise development in a older neighbourhood of  two and three-storey family homes.  Hundreds of Haligonians wrote letters, appeared and spoke at council meetings — all in a bid to stop APL  from building it’s gargantuan 29 storey building – now reduced to 25 storeys — at the corner of Quinpool Rd and Robie St. APL’s design that started out with two hulking towers is now one colossal vertical slab which is supposed to have 10 affordable family-sized apartments.willow-tree-e1521635410860

If HRM (Halifax Regional Municipal) Council had not been in such a hurry to prove they are cosy-friends of developers and builders, it should have waited for a few months to give its approval.  Then the Centre Plan would (likely) kick in and mandate 36 affordable units for a building of that height – rather than the paltry 10 we may end up with. I say ‘may end up with’ because with a 30% increase in the number of apartments,  each apartment will have to be ever so tiny – perhaps 600 plus square feet.  At that size, family apartments and affordability are likely off the agenda.

Of course there is also the case of Westwood Developments Ltd building across from Halifax’s new Central Library.  Westwood decided to build a new hotel-apartment-retail complex which blocks a complete view of Citadel Hill from the Library.  The Central Library, a signature building and one of the few public buildings built in Halifax in decades, boasts a “Living Room” on the top floor.  The Living Room, which is a reading room with comfy chairs and glass walls on three sides, was designed to have panoramic views of Citadel Hill and the Halifax Harbour. 

Below:  on right is the view from the Living Room at the Library before Chedrawe built;  on the left is today’s reality. Note: you can no longer see Citadel Hill 

However neither HRM’s Planning department nor Regional Council decided to protect the view through legislation or negotiation.  Instead, in a huge war of words – and deeds – Danny Chedrawe, Westwood’s President, insisted his new concrete and glass bunker would not destroy the view of the Hill. However Dalhousie University architecture professor Steve Parcell demonstrated how the height and massing of Chedrawe’s bulding would indeed block the Library’s view. Hundreds of people signed postcards and letters to the city demanding Chedrawe’s building not obscure the public’s view of Citadel Hill.  Today the concrete and glass bunker is built, with high end retail shops at street level (what else is new?) – and we, the public, no longer see Citadel Hill from our library’s  “living room”.  Chedrawe’s comments have proved false. Nevertheless, it’s Chedrawe who has the last word – after all his building is built and we don’t have the view.

Now we come to the new downtown Halifax YMCA.  Buried in the hoopla around the forecasted opening of a new Y for late 2019, is the fact that once again the city has been duped.   Nearly seven years ago, HRM council agreed to more than double the allowable height limit from 23 to 49 metres because the Y provided a “public benefit.”  The height variance was sought to create hundreds of high-end condos or apartments, on top of the Y.  At the time, Parks Canada objected to the height variance because the two new buildings would “negatively impact the physical and symbolic values of Citadel Hill” as the new Y would tend to dwarf the national historic site.  Even the city’s own Design Review Committee disagreed with giving the height variance to the developer, citing its impact on Citadel Hill – not to mention creating huge shadows as it also looms over the city’s Public Gardens. 

southwestBut the kicker these seven years later is this:  part of the “public benefit” of the Y was supposed to be its new state-of-the-art daycare centre.  The old Y had a very respectable non-profit childcare centre; when the old Y closed in 2014, the centre was moved to an old church on Robie St.  Now that centre has closed yet more and more families still require licensed quality childcare on the Halifax peninsula. 

Recently, the advertising and promotion for the new Y has changed.  Now the Y promotes its Family Development Centre –basically a big open space where parents can play with their kids. The new Halifax Y boasts a huge gym, swimming pools, four wellness studios, one spinning room — but no childcare centre. child-care-professional-building-blocks-with-children

Again the city has been caught with its pants down – just last week the Y asked council to contribute $1 million to building the Y because of cost over-runs. They’re not kidding – building costs have increased nearly 20%  to $37 million since 2011. Both the province and the feds each gave $5 million to the project. And while the family of the late John Lindsay donated $3 million – the public through our taxes donated three times more.  Yet the Y will be named after Lindsay.

Getting back to the childcare centre, as Tim Bousquet points out in the Halifax Examiner, the developer, Southwest Properties, and the Y decided to forego the daycare centre.  One reason is that regulations stipulate that childcare centers should be located on the main floor to facilitate easy exit in the event of fire. But the new building’s main floor is ear-marked for retail stores, not childcare.  Secondly, the provincial government has now rolled out its free pre-primary school program available to most families with four-year-olds.  So childcare centres are now catering mainly to younger children.  Because there is a higher staff to child ratio in the care for younger children, it is more expensive to provide childcare to them. Since the pre-primary program is available and free of charge, families will not typically utilize daycare for their four year olds.  So families of older pre-schoolers will no longer offset the costs of care for toddlers and babies. So the Y decided to ditch the idea of childcare altogether.

Yet childcare was part of the public benefit which allowed for the original height to be doubled.

Here we have three developers who’ve managed to get more than what they wanted from the city – and give almost nothing back.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s